Trump
Der beste Präsident aller Zeiten, ist ohne Frage der 45. US-Präsident Donald John Trump! Denn ER ist es – der wie ein Frank Zappa – bereit ist, das wahre Gesicht des US Imperialismus ungeschminkt und „cheesy“ offenzulegen und zu zeigen! Wir sollten ihn dafür feiern! Das Wehklagen des Establishments und seiner faked Präsidenten – wie dem Massenmörder Obama, oder seiner demokratischen Nachfolge-Kandidatin Hillary Clinton, der „erfolgreichsten Waffenhändlerin der Geschichte“ – sind lange als Lügner, Kriegstreiber, übelste Kapitalisten, Menschen Verachter und Umweltverbrecher durchschaut! Dieses Establishment und seine Kampagnenpresse, werden immer hysterischer und zügelloser in ihren Bemühungen, diesen tatsächlich stattfindenden Wandel zu diffamieren. Diese Machtelite erschafft dabei genau die Atmosphäre der Verrohung und Verblödung, den es in Bezug auf das ‚Ungeheuer‘ Trump zu bekämpfen vorgibt. Ein klares Zeichen seiner Angst, Erosion und Schwäche.
Djdeutschland
Same as ist ever was
Die Bombenleger und Waffenschieber haben eine Art wirtschaftliches Perpetuum Mobile erfunden, erst werden gute, willige Rebellen aufgerüstet und dann wieder weggebombt. Eine ausgeklügelte Unsicherheitsarchitektur, aus Lügen, Angst und Desinformation, die für eine immer währende Bedrohungslage und Krieg sorgen. Was gestern noch Freund war, ist heute Bedroher unserer Freiheit und unseres Wohlstands.
Am Anfang stehen nicht etwa Rohstoffinteressen, sondern Massenvergewaltigungen, oder Massenvernichtungswaffen; Angriffe auf das eigene Volk, Baby’s die aus ihren Brutkästen gerissen werden, oder wie bei den Nazis: Juden die Kinder fressen. Keiner hat’s gesehen, aber es soll tatsächlich passiert sein. Am Ende verdienen immer die selben. Kaum zu glauben, daß wir uns das gleiche Muster immer wieder neu aufbinden lassen!
You allow killing and torture, why not choom?
Obama begeistertes Mitglied der Choom-Gang inhalierte möglichst tief und hielt den Rauch möglichst lange in der Lunge.
Die Maßnahmen
Die Faulen werden geschlachtet, die Welt wird fleißig. Die Häßlichen werden geschlachtet, die Welt wird schön. Die Narren werden geschlachtet, die Welt wird weise. Die Kranken werden geschlachtet, die Welt wird gesund. Die Alten werden geschlachtet, die Welt wird jung. Die Traurigen werden geschlachtet, die Welt wird lustig. Die Feinde werden geschlachtet, die Welt wird freundlich. Die Bösen werden geschlachtet, die Welt wird gut.
Erich Fried
Private Manning’s Humiliation
Bradley Manning is the soldier charged with leaking U.S. government documents to Wikileaks. He is currently detained under degrading and inhumane conditions that are illegal and immoral.
For nine months, Manning has been confined to his cell for 23 hours a day. During his one remaining hour, he can walk in circles in another room, with no other prisoners present. He is not allowed to doze off or relax during the day, but must answer the question “Are you OK?” verbally and in the affirmative every five minutes. At night, he is awakened to be asked again, “are you OK” every time he turns his back to the cell door or covers his head with a blanket so that the guards cannot see his face. During the past week he was forced to sleep naked and stand naked for inspection in front of his cell, and for the indefinite future must remove his clothes and wear a „smock“ under claims of risk to himself that he disputes.
The sum of the treatment that has been widely reported is a violation of the Eighth Amendment’s prohibition of cruel and unusual punishment, and the Fifth Amendment’s guarantee against punishment without trial. If continued, it may well amount to a violation of the criminal statute against torture, defined as, among other things, “the administration or application… of… procedures calculated to disrupt profoundly the senses or the personality.”
Private Manning has been designated as an appropriate subject for both Maximum Security and Prevention of Injury (POI) detention. But he asserts that his administrative reports consistently describe him as a well-behaved prisoner who does not fit the requirements for Maximum Security detention. The Brig psychiatrist began recommending his removal from Prevention of Injury months ago. These claims have not been publicly contested. In an Orwellian twist, the spokesman for the brig commander refused to explain the forced nudity “because to discuss the details would be a violation of Manning’s privacy.”
The Administration has provided no evidence that Manning’s treatment reflects a concern for his own safety or that of other inmates. Unless and until it does so, there is only one reasonable inference: this pattern of degrading treatment aims either to deter future whistleblowers, or to force Manning to implicate Wikileaks founder Julian Assange in a conspiracy, or both.
If Manning is guilty of a crime, let him be tried, convicted, and punished according to law. But his treatment must be consistent with the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. There is no excuse for his degrading and inhumane pre-trial punishment. As the State Department’s PJ Crowly put it recently, they are “counterproductive and stupid.” And yet Crowley has now been forced to resign for speaking the plain truth.
The Wikileaks disclosures have touched every corner of the world. Now the whole world watches America and observes what it does; not what it says.
President Obama was once a professor of constitutional law, and entered the national stage as an eloquent moral leader. The question now, however, is whether his conduct as Commander in Chief meets fundamental standards of decency. He should not merely assert that Manning’s confinement is “appropriate and meet[s] our basic standards,” as he did recently. He should require the Pentagon publicly to document the grounds for its extraordinary actions –and immediately end those which cannot withstand the light of day.
Signed:
Bruce Ackerman, Yale Law School
Yochai Benkler, Harvard Law School
Additional Signatories (institutional affiliation, for identification purposes only):
Jack Balkin, Yale Law School
Richard L. Abel, UCLA Law
David Abrams, Harvard Law School
Martha Ackelsberg, Smith College
Julia Adams, Sociology, Yale University
Kirsten Ainley, London School of Economics
Jeffrey Alexander, Yale University
Philip Alston, NYU School of Law
Anne Alstott, Harvard Law School
Elizabeth Anderson, Philosophy and Women’s Studies, University of Michigan
Kevin Anderson, University of California
Scott Anderson, Philosophy, University of British Columbia
Claudia Angelos, NYU School of Law
Donald K. Anton. Australian National University College of Law
Joyce Appleby, History, UCLA
Kwame Anthony Appiah, Princeton University
Stanley Aronowitz, Sociology, CUNY Graduate Center
Jean Maria Arrigo, PhD, social psychologist, Project on Ethics and Art in Testimony
Reuven Avi-Yonah, University of Michigan Law
H. Robert Baker, Georgia State University
Katherine Beckett, University of Washington
Duncan Bell, Politics and International Studies, University of Cambridge
Steve Berenson, Thomas Jefferson School of Law
Michael Bertrand, UNC Chapel Hill
Christoph Bezemek, Public Law, Vienna University of Economics and Business
Michael J. Bosia, Political Science, Saint Michael’s College
Bret Boyce, University of Detroit Mercy School of Law
Rebecca M. Bratspies, CUNY School of Law
Jason Brennan, Philosophy, Brown University
Talbot Brewer, Philosophy, University of Virginia
John Bronsteen, Loyola University Chicago
Peter Brooks, Princeton University
James Robert Brown, University of Toronto
Sande L. Buhai,Loyola Law School, Los Angeles
Ahmed I Bulbulia, Seton Hall Law School
Susannah Camic, University of Wisconsin Law School
Lauren Carasik, Western New England College School of Law
Teri L. Caraway, University of Minnesota
Alexander M. Capron, University of Southern California, Gould School of Law
Michael W. Carroll, Law American University
Marshall Carter-Tripp, Ph.D, Foreign Service Officer, retired
Jonathan Chausovsky, Political Science, SUNY-Fredonia
Carol Chomsky, University of Minnesota Law School
John Clippinger, Berkman Center for Internet and Society
Andrew Jason Cohen, Georgia State University
Lizabeth Cohen, Harvard University
Marjorie Cohn, Thomas Jefferson School of Law
Doug Colbert, Maryland School of Law
Sheila Collins, William Paterson University
Nancy Combs, William& Mary Law School
Stephen A. Conrad, Indiana University Mauer School of Law
Steve Cook, Philosophy, Utica College
Robert Crawford,Arts and Sciences, University of Washington
Thomas P. Crocker, University of South Carolina
Jennifer Curtin, UCI School of Medicine
Deryl D. Dantzler, Walter F. Gorge School of Law of Mercer University
Benjamin G. Davis, University of Toledo College of Law
Rochelle Davis, School of Foreign Service, Georgetown University
Wolfgang Deckers, Richmond University, London
Michelle M. Dempsey, Villanova University School of Law
Wai Chee Dimock, English, Yale University
Sinan Dogramaci, Philosophy, University of Texas at Austin
Zayd Dohrn, Northwestern University
Jason P. Dominguez, Texas Southern University
Judith Donath, Fellow, Berkman Center for Internet and Society
Norman Dorsen, New York University School of Law
Michael W. Doyle, International Affairs, Law and Political Science, Columbia
Bruce T. Draine, Astrophysics, Princeton University
Jay Driskell,History, Hood College
Michael C. Duff, University of Wyoming College of Law
Lisa Duggan, Social and Cultural Analysis, NYU
Cynthia Fuchs Epstein, Graduate Center,CUNY
Stephen M. Engel, PhD, Political Science, Marquette University
Simon Evnine, Philosophy, University of Miami
Mark Fenster, Levin College of Law, University of Florida
Martha Field, Harvard Law School
Justin Fisher, Philosophy, Southern Methodist University
William Fisher, Harvard Law School
Joseph Fishkin, University of Texas School of Law
Mark Fishman, Sociology, Brooklyn College
Martin S. Flaherty, Fordham Law School
George P. Fletcher, Columbia University, School of Law
John Flood, Law and Sociology, University of Westminster
Michael Forman, University of Washington Tacoma
Bryan Frances, Philosophy, Fordham University
Katherine Franke, Columbia Law School
Nancy Fraser, Philosophy and Politics, New School for Social Research
Eric M. Freedman, Hofstra Law School
Monroe H. Freedman, Hofstra University Law School
Kennan Ferguson, University of Wisconsin, MilWaukee
John R. Fitzpatrick, Philosophy, University of Tennessee/Chattanooga
A. Michael Froomkin, University of Miami School of Law
Gerald Frug, Harvard Law School
Louis Furmanski, University of Central Oklahoma
James K. Galbraith, LBJ School of Public Affairs, University of Texas at Austin
Herbert J Gans, Columbia University
William Gardner, Pediatrics, Psychology,& Psychiatry, The Ohio State University
Urs Gasser, Harvard Law School, Berkman Center for Internet and Society
Julius G. Getman, University of Texas Law School
Todd Gitlin, Columbia University
Bob Goodin, Australian National University
Angelina Snodgrass Godoy, Human Rights, University of Washington
David Golove, NYU School of Law
James R. Goetsch Jr., Philosophy, Eckerd College
Thomas Gokey, Art and Information Studies, Syracuse University
Robert W. Gordon, Yale Law School
Stephen E. Gottlieb, Albany Law School
Mark A. Graber, University of Maryland School of Law
Jorie Graham, Harvard University
Roger Green, Pol. Sci. and Pub. Admin., Florida Gulf Coast
Daniel JH Greenwood, Hofstra University School of Law
Christopher L. Griffin, Visiting, Duke Law School
James Grimmelmann, New York Law School
James Gronquist,Charlotte School of Law
Jean Grossholtz, Politics, Mount Holyoke College
Lisa Guenther, Philosophy, Vanderbilt University
Christopher Guzelian, Thomas Jefferson School of Law
Gillian K. Hadfield, Law, Economics, University of Southern California
Jonathan Hafetz, Seton Hall University School of Law
Lisa Hajjar, University of California – Santa Barbara
Susan Hazeldean, Robert M. Cover Fellow, Yale Law School
Dirk t. D. Held, Classics, Connecticut College
Kevin Jon Heller, Melbourne Law School
Lynne Henderson, UNLV–Boyd School of Law (emerita)
Stephen Hetherington, Philosophy, University of New South Wales
Kurt Hochenauer, University of Central Oklahoma
Lonny Hoffman, Univ of Houston Law Center
Michael Hopkins, MHC International Ltd
Nathan Robert Howard, St. Andrews
Marc Morjé Howard, Government, Georgetown University
Kyron Huigens, Cardozo School of Law
Alexandra Huneeus, University of Wisconsin Law School
David Ingram, Philosophy, Loyola University Chicago
David Isenberg, Isen.com
Sheila Jasanoff, Harvard Kennedy School
Christopher Jencks, Harvard Kennedy School
Paula Johnson, Alliant International University
Robert N. Johnson, Philosophy, University of Missouri
Albyn C. Jones, Statistics, Reed College
Lynne Joyrich, Modern Culture and Media, Brown University
David Kairys, Beasley Law School
Eileen Kaufman, Touro Law Center
Kevin B. Kelly, Seton Hall University School of Law
Antti Kauppinen, Philosophy, Trinity College Dublin
Randall Kennedy, Harvard Law School
Daniel Kevles, Yale University
Heidi Kitrosser, University of Minnesota Law School
Gillian R. Knapp, Princeton University
Seth F. Kreimer University of Pennsylvania Law School
Alex Kreit, Thomas Jefferson School of Law
Stefan H. Krieger, Hofstra University School of Law
Mitchell Lasser, Cornell Law School
Mark LeBar, Philosophy, Ohio University
Brian Leiter, University of Chicago
Mary Clare Lennon, Sociology, The Graduate Center, CUNY
George Levine,Rutgers University
Sanford Levinson, University of Texas Law School
Margaret Levi, Pol. Sci., University of Washington and University of Sydney
Tracy Lightcap, Political Science, LaGrange College
Daniel Lipson, Political Science, SUNY New Paltz
Stacy Litz, Drexel University
Fiona de Londras, University College Dublin, Ireland
John Lunstroth, University of Houston Law Center
David Luban, Georgetown University Law Center
Peter Ludlow, Philosophy, Northwestern University
Cecelia Lynch, University of California
David Lyons, Boston University
Colin Maclay, Harvard University, Berkman Center
Joan Mahoney, Emeritus, Wayne State University Law School
Chibli Mallat, Visiting Professor, Harvard Law School
Phil Malone, Harvard Law School
Jane Mansbridge, Harvard Kennedy School
Jeff Manza, Sociology, New York University
Dan Markel, Florida State University
Daniel Markovits, Yale Law School
Richard Markovits, University of Texas Law School
Michael R. Masinter, Nova Southeastern University
Ruth Mason, University of Connecticut School of Law
Rachel A. May, University of South Florida
Jamie Mayerfeld, Political Science, University of Washington
Diane H. Mazur, University of Florida Levin College of Law
Jason Mazzone, Brooklyn Law School
Jeff McMahan, Philosophy, Rutgers University
Richard J. Meagher Jr., Randolph-Macon College
Agustín José Menéndez, Universidad de León and University of Oslo
Hope Metcalf, Yale Law School
Frank I. Michelman, Harvard University
Gary Minda, Brooklyn Law School
John Mikhail, Georgetown University Law Center
Gregg Miller, Political Science, University of Washington
Eben Moglen, Columbia Law School and Software Freedom Law Center
Immanuel Ness, Brooklyn College, City University of New York
Charles Nesson, Harvard University
Joel Ngugi, Law, African Studies, University of Washington
Ralitza Nikolaeva, ISCTE Business School, Lisbon University Institute
John Palfrey, Harvard Law School
James Paradis, Comparative Media Studies, MIT
Emma Perry, London School of Economics and Political Science
Charles Pigden, University of Otago
Adrian du Plessis, Wolfson College, Cambridge University
Patrick S. O’Donnell, Philosophy, Santa Barbara City College
Hans Oberdiek, Philosophy, Swarthmore College
Duane Oldfield, Political Science, Knox College
Michael Paris, Political Science, The College of Staten Island (CUNY)
Philip Pettit, University Professor of Politics and Human Values, Princeton
Frank A. Pasquale, Seton Hall Law School
Matthew Pierce, University of North Carolina
Charles Pigden, Philosophy, University of Otago
Leslie Plachta, MD MPH, Albert Einstein College of Medicine
Thomas Pogge, Yale University
Giovanna Pompele, University of Miami
Joel Pust, Philosophy, University of Delaware
Ulrich K. Preuss, Law& Politics, Hertie School of Governance, Berlin
Margaret Jane Radin, University of Michigan and emerita, Stanford University
Aziz Rana, Cornell University Law School
Gustav Ranis, Yale University
Rahul Rao, School of Oriental& African Studies, University of London
Calair Rasmussen, Affiliation: Political Science, University of Delaware
Daniel Ray, Thomas M. Cooley Law School
Jeff A. Redding, Saint Louis University School of Law
C. D. C. Reeve, Philosophy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Bryan Register, Philosophy, Texas State University
Robert B. Reich, University of California, Berkeley
Cassandra Burke Robertson, Case Western Reserve University School of Law
John A. Robertson, University of Texas Law School
Corey Robin, Brooklyn College and the CUNY Graduate Center
Clarissa Rojas, CSU Long Beach
Kermit Roosevelt, University of Pennsylvania Law School
Susan Rose-Ackerman, Law, Political Science, Yale University
Norm Rosenberg, History, Macalester College
Clifford Rosky, University of Utah
Brad R. Roth, Poli. Sci. and Law, Wayne State University
Barbara Katz Rothman, Sociology, City University of New York
Bo Rothstein Political Science, University of Gothenburg
Laura L. Rovner,University of Denver College of Law
Donald Rutherford,Philosophy, University of California, San Diego
Leonard Rubenstein, JD, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health
Chester M. Rzadkiewicz, History, University of Louisiana at Lafayette
DeWitt Sage, Flimmaker
Cindy Skach, Comparative Government and Law, Oxford
William J. Talbott, Philosophy, University of Washington
Natsu Taylor Saito, Georgia State University College of Law
Dean Savage, Queens College, Sociology, CUNY
Kent D. Schenkel, New England Law
Kim Scheppele, Princeton Univeristy
Ben Schoenbachler, Psychiatry, University of Louisville
Jeffrey Schnapp, Harvard University
Kenneth Sherrill, Political Science, Hunter College
Claire Snyder-Hall, George Mason University
Jeffrey Selbin, Yale Law School
Wendy Seltzer, Fellow, Princeton Center for Information Technology Policy
Jose M. Sentmanat, Philosophy, Moreno Valley College, California
Omnia El Shakry, History, University of California
Scott Shapiro, Yale University
Stephen Sheehi, Languages, Lit. and Cultures, University of South Carolina
James Silk, Yale Law School
Robert D. Sloane, Boston University School of Law
Ronald C. Slye, Law, Seattle University
Matthew Noah Smith, Philosophy, Yale University
Stephen Samuel Smith, Political Science, Winthrop University
John M. Stewart, Emeritus, Psychology, Northland College
Peter G. Stillman, Vassar College
Alec Stone Sweet, Yale Law School
Robert N. Strassfeld, Case Western Reserve University School of Law
Mateo Taussig-Rubbo, SUNY-Buffalo Law School
Jeanne Theoharis, Brooklyn College of CUNY
Frank Thompson, University of Michigan
Matthew Titolo, West Virginia University College of Law
Massimo de la Torre, University of Hull Law School
John Torpey, CUNY Graduate Center
Vilna Bashi Treitler, Black& Hispanic Studies, Baruch College, City
Laurence H. Tribe, Harvard University
David M. Trubek, University of Wisconsin (emeritus)
Robert L. Tsai, American University, Washington College of Law
Peter Vallentyne, Philosophy, University of Missouri
Joan Vogel, Vermont Law School
Paul Voice, Philosophy, Bennington College
Victor Wallis,Berklee College of Music
David Watkins, Political Science, University of Dayton
Jonathan Weinberg, Wayne State University
Henry Weinstein, Law, Literary Journalism, University of California
Margaret Weir, Political Science,University of California, Berkeley
Christina E. Wells, University of Missouri School of Law
Danielle Wenner, Rice University
Bryan H. Wildenthal, Thomas Jefferson School of Law
Langdon Winner,Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
Naomi Wolf, author
Lauris Wren, Hofstra Law School
Elizabeth Wurtzel, Attorney and author
Betty Yorburg, Emerita, City University of New York
Benjamin S. Yost, Philosophy, Providence College
Jonathan Zasloff, UCLA School of Law
Michael J. Zimmer, Professor of Law, Loyola University Chicago
Lee Zimmerman, English, Hofstra University
Mary Marsh Zulack, Columbia Law School
Quelle: Balkinization
The curtain is away
So, Why is Wikileaks a Good Thing Again?
WikiLeaks revealed how the CIA kidnapped an innocent German and tortured him for months, then attempting to stop Germany from arresting its operatives.
The WikiLeaks Iraq war logs have caused the UN to urge for a full U.S. torture investigation.
WikiLeaks has revealed how scientists manipulated global warming research data in order to make it seem more consequential.
WikiLeaks showed how the Obama administration handed over Iraqi detainees despite reports of torture.
WikiLeaks has convinced the European Parliament to form a transatlantic inquiry into torture cases in Iraq.
WikiLeaks revealed how U.S. troops were specifically ordered to turn a blind eye to torture in Iraq.
WikiLeaks has revealed the National Socialist Movement’s neo-nazi internal workings.
WikiLeaks detailed December 2006, the bloodiest month in Iraq’s war, with 103 civilians dying every day.
WikiLeaks has demonstrated how Australia, Finland and Denmark are using child pornography as an excuse to censor legitimate websites.
The documents released by WikiLeaks have convinced the UN to call for investigations into human rights violations.
WikiLeaks has shown how U.S. troops repeatedly failed to detail civilian deaths in Iraq, even in large-scale seiges.
WikiLeaks has never exposed a source and has provided lawyers and financial backing for the trial of alleged whistleblower Bradley Manning.
WikiLeaks detailed Al-Qaeda’s use of chemical weapons in Iraq.
WikiLeaks revealed Al-Qaeda’s deadly exploitation of children in Iraq.
WikiLeaks revealed how Trafigura, an African oil company, caused widespread illness through a toxic gas dump.
WikiLeaks revealed how the CIA and Hillary Clinton ordered U.S. diplomats to spy on UN leadership, even collecting DNA data.
WikiLeaks revealed more than 15,000 civilian deaths in Iraq that had previously been concealed by the U.S. government.
WikiLeaks revealed allegations of U.S. troops abusing Iraqi prisoners even after Abu Ghraib.
WikiLeaks uncovered the truth behind Iceland’s 2009 financial crisis, bringing many corrupt managers to justice.
WikiLeaks revealed how U.S. forces killed hundreds of innocent civilians at checkpoints in Iraq.
http://sowhyiswikileaksagoodthingagain.com/
WikiLeaks exposed Scientology, a religion that scams its followers into a delusional set of beliefs in exchange for their money.
WikiLeaks revealed how Iran devised suicide weaponry for Al-Qaeda use in Iraq.
WikiLeaks ended the corrupt rule of the Arap-Moi family in Kenya.
WikiLeaks has revealed hundreds of significant Afghanistan war incidents that were hidden by the U.S. government.
WikiLeaks clarified the terms of operation at Guantanamo Bay, one of the most controversial detention centers in the world.
WikiLeaks revealed the previously unreported deaths of four Canadian soldiers at the hands of U.S. friendly fire in Afghanistan.
WikiLeaks exposed how the U.S. pressured Spain to drop the case of a cameraman that was killed in a 2003 attack on journalists in Baghdad…
Fuck off Raketen
Berlin und Paris wollen Moskau
mit ins Raketenschildbürgerstreichboot holen. Gegen wen es geht, oder wo der Feind steht, bleibt diffus. Und wo ist Obama, war doch ’ne US-Idee? Der denkt wahrscheinlich längst: Fuck off Raketen, wir haben Stuxnet! Wir brauchen alles mögliche, nur keine Raketen! Raketen helfen gegen Raketen wie Terrorismus gegen Terroristen; wie billiges Geld gegen Inflation, oder Freifrau zu Guttenberg gegen Geilheit und Sexsucht.
Hillary hat gerade den größten Rüstungsdeal der Geschichte an Land gezogen; die Kunden alles brave Monarchisten. Wenn die russischen Kriegsverbrecher mit an Bord sind, bleibt nur Kim Jong-il’s Brut, um was rüber zuschicken und natürlich Ahmadine, der Lieblingsfeind des Abendlands. Freund der Palästinenser, der jüngst, brandgefährlich, provokativ, die von der israelischen Armee in Grund und Boden gebombten Gebiete im Libanon besuchte, welche mit iranische Hilfe wiederaufgebaut wurden, der Kriegsverbrecher.
Glaubt ihr, wir sind blöd? Ihr wollt nur ablenken und sinnlos Krieg führen. Lasst uns bloß in Ruhe mit euern Raketen! Sonst stecken, wir euch die Bude an, wie die Franzosen es tun schon wegen der Rente!
Djdeutschland
Gezielt töten
Man nehme
einen symbolträchtigen Turm diesmal in Europa, einen Islamisten, Ahmad S., natürlich aus Hamburg, halte ihn gegen internationales Recht, in einem illegalen Gefangenenlager der US-Basis Bagram (Afghanistan) fest, foltere ein Geständnis aus ihm heraus; er sei in Pakistan ausgebildet und ausgesandt ähnlich des ‚Drehbuchs‘ der Anschläge von Mumbai, Attentatspläne des „Punktpunktkommastrich – fertig ist das Terrorgesicht“ Al-Kaida-Führers Usama bin Ladin zu verüben. Schon geht die Kasse auf. Nacktscanner finden reissenden Absatz, die Presse kann über Wichtigeres berichten und die Bundeswehr von einer Bürgerarmee in eine effizientere Privatarmee umgewandelt werden. Man löse das Problem sauber vom heimischen Computer mit ferngesteuerten Drohnen, Bombardements und Würmern . Ist zwar wie eine billige Soap, aber weit weg und es gibt auch keine Bilder zerfetzter, verbrannter Körper und O-Töne betroffen machender Einzelschicksale. Man nennt es gezielt töten aus Notwehr! Das sollte mal ein ehemaliges Mitglied der RAF behaupten.
Djdeutschland
Global Zero Brain
Auf der Atomkonferenz,
sorgt man sich besonderes darum,
daß ein schiitischer Gottesstaat in den Besitz
von Atomwaffeen gelangen könnte.
Man glaubt an die Bombe.
Deswegen haben die Gastgeber dieser ‚Gläubigen‘,
die als erste und einzige Nation Hunderttausende damit vernichtet haben,
den Iran auch nicht eingeladen.
„Es muß verhindert werden,
daß Terroristen in den Besitz solcher Waffen gelangen.“
Dass ein Apartheitsstaat wie Israel, im Gegensatz zum Iran
den Atomwaffensperrvertrag nicht unterzeichnet hat,
höchstwahrscheinlich im Besitz solcher Waffen ist,
ständig abseits des Menschenrechts Krieg führt
und sich für besser als den Rest der Welt hält,
beunruhigt dort keinen Menschen.
Jedenfalls nicht im Lager der ‚Gläubigen‘.
Ohne Krieg, das hatte Obama ja bei der Verleihung
des Friedensnobelpreises gesagt, geht nicht.
Krieg gehört zum Menschen dazu.
Und deswegen brauchen wir den Iran.
Mit dem immer gleichem Muster wie schon seit der Kubakrise,
wird uns das Böse, der Feind, der Grund,
ein nächster Krieg vorgezeichnet.
In den Arsenalen der Militärs gibt es Tonnen
von waffenfähigem Uran und Plutonium,
für hunderte Atombomben.
Auch zivil wird weiter und weiter
spaltbares Material produziert,
das ’sicher‘ für Millionen von Jahren, nicht noch einmal
in die falschen Hände geraten darf!
Glauben wir das?
Das können nur Leute,
die an Endsieg glauben wirklich glauben!
Ich glaube nicht ‚mal an ein Endlager.
Djdeutschland
Hundert Tage fünfzig Staaten * Nevada
Was soll man über Nevada sagen?
Sicher Wüste, natürlich Las Vegas, Indianer, Atomtests, Cowboys, Area 51,
also jede Menge Wildes, Verschworenes, Verbotenes und Giftiges.
Zum Beispiel YUCCA MOUNTAIN
Da soll für alle
Zukunft
der Atommüll hin.
Das kostet MillionenMilliarden,
Obwohl die Uhr schon längst anders tickt,
der staatliche Einlagensicherungsfonds FDIC
schloss am Freitag die Savings Bank in Nevada.
Zukunftsweisend baut dort die deutsche Firma Schott Solar
das Solarthermische Kraftwerk „Nevada Solar One“.
Las Vegas braucht viel Strom.
Ulf Behrens und Simon Goertz
haben hier unter anderem Szenen
ihres großen Films ‚Exploding Ego‘ gedreht:
exploding ego ulf behrens simon görts trailer mov amerika roadmo
DjDeutschland
Letzte Kommentare